Everyone
loves Christopher
Nolan. He has
directing credits, and writing credits for some of the most popular
movies in the last ten years. Geeks and nerds around the world are
building shrines in his name. I want to point this out, because I
don't believe anything I say here will cause him to weep in a corner
on a big pile of money. He is also from London, so at best, he might
give me a hearty “Cheers,
mate”, if he took
time to read my rant.
I
should also explain, he's not a horrible director. I will give
credit where credit is due of course, but we need to take a moment
and examine his popularity. Today, I plan to finally expose how this
man has somehow brainwashed the world into accepting him as a hero.
Once again, our core nerd values are at stake, and yet, he continues
to gain accolades, where none are due!
Blasphemy
you say??? Don't believe me? Let's take a moment to dissect the
movies that people have been shoving down my throat telling me how
good they are.
Memento
(2000)
Here's
a trailer:
If
you're curious, he has no super powers, so the intro with the gun
flying into his hand, is what the kids call trick
photography. Guy
Pearce plays Leonard,
a guy who suffers from a very real mental illness (called anterograde
amnesia, for future psychiatric students reading). While trying to
keep track of people he met, and things that happen, he's constantly
writing notes, and taking pictures. But since we live in America,
people love to play cruel jokes on someone like this, so he's never
sure what to believe.
But
Mr. Nolan wasn't content to just tell a story. He had to tell a
confusing story!
I can only assume he watched too much Pulp
Fiction, or
episodes of Lost,
where the story jumps around through time. Memento
tells the story mostly in reverse, backing up roughly 10 minutes at a
time. Since I'm not one of those “smart”
people, a very straightforward story, suddenly became a big mess.
Whatever
happened to linear story telling??? Maybe I can sort of understand
why he did this, because it does build a bit of a mystery. But when
you put things in order, it's a pretty good movie, so why screw with
it?? And if you're curious to see it in the proper sequence, youtube
has versions of the entire movie, re-edited in the proper sequence
for your listening and dancing pleasure.
RottenTomatoes gave Memento a 92%. Maybe I'm just a clueless idiot?
Personally,
I thought it was done right the first time in 1994, when it starred
Dana Carvey
and was called Clean
Slate. Here's
another trailer:
Although,
the real credit should go to Saturday
Night Live, and
Tom Hanks
for creating Mr.
Short-Term Memory in
1988:
This
brings us to the movie that made Nolan “legendary”
(note the quotes):
Batman
Begins (2005)
Here's
an important life lesson: You
don't have to work too hard to impress anyone, if everyone else
screwed it up. Case
in point, 1997's Batman
and Robin *cringe*.
I
sincerely hope you know how bad Joel
Schumacher's
version of Batman was (starring George
Clooney).
If however, you enjoyed
it, please stop reading now and seek professional help.
So
in 2005, nerds everywhere rejoiced! Someone took the character of
Batman seriously, and made a believable movie about this epic
franchise! There were a lot of things to like about this movie.
Christian
Bale
made a very good Bruce Wayne (although questionable Batman with his
painfully gravely voice). Gary
Oldman
made a great Jim Gordon. You also had Michael
Caine,
Liam
Neeson,
Cillian
Murphy,
and Morgan
Freeman.
Very
impressive!
Well, on a personal note, Katie
Holmes
just did the job and never overly impressed me.
And
with a surprisingly decent script by David
Goyer
and Christopher
Nolan,
this was a very good Batman movie.
But,
I
can hear you shouting, “But
Deeesher, why didn't you looooove this movie???” I
said I enjoyed it. But looooove
is a very strong word. The main reason, is because I couldn't find
any “moments”
in this movie.
When
I watch a movie, I look for something artistic and memorable. Think
back on movies you love, and there are always scenes and dialogue
that stick out very clearly in your mind. Whether it's Kirk
screaming “KHAAAAAAAAAAN!!”,
or Charlton Heston
pounding his fist on the sand in front of the busted up Statue of
Liberty, or Superman catching a helicopter in 1978, or King
Leonidas shouting
“This.. is.. Sparta!”
before kicking the dude into the bottomless pit. These moments
have power, and impact. A movie isn't required to have these moments
to be enjoyable (or successful), but it really does help in this
particular genre.
How
often did Batman
Begins
slap you in the face and make you realize you were watching something
epic? Was there a “Snakes...
why'd it have to be snakes...”
moment? Was there even a “Luke,
I am your father”
moment? How about a “There
is no spoon” moment?
I got none of that. To me, this is the difference between like, and
loooove.
Batman
Begins was
just a wash
of mud. An enjoyable wash, but still just mud. And isn't the job of
a director, to make something memorable for moviegoers? Maybe you
will tell me that was the fault of the scriptwriter (just as a
reminder, Nolan co-wrote the screenplay). Or maybe it was the fault
of the actors.
But
one thing I can blame Nolan for, is the look. Movies are meant to
tell a story, and possibly also be be artistic. The more epic your
movie, the more artistic I will expect it to be. If your name is Rob
Schneider,
I'm not expecting to see anything cinematically beautiful on the
screen. If you name your movie Sharknado,
I can lower my expectations exponentially. However, if you are
spending millions of dollars to create something, that you expect to
make billions of dollars for, I will anticipate something to really
wow me.
Technicolor
was invented in 1916. Why
isn't he using it???
Movies have colors like, red, green, blue, yellow. I'm pretty sure
there are a few other colors, but overall, when used properly, they
tend to give a movie a bit of life. All I see from Nolan, is brown,
black, and white. Memento
added some light blue and occasional black and white scenes, but
that's it. Is Nolan colorblind? Have I finally exposed his deepest
secret perhaps?
And
now you shout to me, “But
Deeesher, this is Batman, The Dark Knight! Of course it's supposed
to be dark and gritty in Gotham!”.
Now I must remind you of a movie from 1994, called The
Crow,
starring Brandon
Lee.
This was also based on a comic book. But not just any comic book...
a black and white comic book! The
Crow
somehow managed to use color, but still created the same feel as the
comic book. I always said, it was one of the best black and white
color movies ever made. But whatever happened to director Alex
Proyas?
Well, please just remember how good The
Crow was.
But
let's move on shall we...
The
Prestige
(2006)
A
movie filled with superheroes! Okay, maybe not. Two magicians from
London in the 1890's hate each other. Starring
Hugh Jackman
(formerly known as Wolverine),
Christian
Bale
(formerly known as Batman),
Scarlett
Johansson
(formerly known as Black
Widow),
and
David Bowie
(formerly known as Ziggy
Stardust...
look it up
kids!).
For
the most part, I enjoyed this movie. Although, I did figure out 'the
twist' half way through. But it was still a good story, maybe cause
I like magic, and Tesla.
I will even go so far, to give Nolan a pass for the browns, blacks
and white look of this film, because remember, nobody invented color
until 1916.
However,
once again, Nolan seems to enjoy this non-linear storytelling. Maybe
I could accept it, if there was a very obvious change in the look of
the scene, showing you it's six months earlier, or one year later
etc. Maybe you could even put text at the bottom of the screen,
saying “Six
months earlier”.
But with my tiny brain, I had to really pay attention to the scene
to figure out when in the story it takes place, causing me a bit more
confusion than I am accustomed to.
The
Dark Knight
(2008)
Heath
Ledger, Heath Ledger, Heath Ledger.
I can't say enough about his performance. Remember those
'moments'
I talked about earlier? Here
they are! His
performance as Joker
really helps you ignore some of the flaws in this movie. And sadly,
there are still plenty of flaws.
Again,
keeping consistent, we have the drab browns, blacks, whites and
greys. The exception being the Joker.
The only bit of life in this entire dull looking franchise.
Otherwise, once again, I felt this was more like CSI:
Gotham City,
than a theatrical movie.
The
story was decent, but I will always say Harvey
Dent's
story, (played by Aaron
Eckhart)
needed to end after Joker
visited him in the hospital. Instead, suddenly we have two villains
to contend with at the end of the movie. Two-Face should have been
saved for the third movie in the trilogy.
Inception
(2010)
Well
this was interesting. Dreams, within dreams, within dreams etc. It
was unique (if you ignore Dreamscape
starring
Dennis
Quaid
and Max
Von Sydow
from 1984). I can say I mostly enjoyed this. Although, Nolan's use
of browns, blacks, and greys are getting very old very quickly.
There was some pretty things visually, which was a nice change of
pace for Nolan.
Dark
Knight Rises
(2012)
*sigh*
So
much potential. So much crap. I did give this movie a fairly decent
review, if you shut off your brain and stop thinking. If you don't
examine the story too closely, it was fun-ish.
Tom Hardy
as Bane
made it mostly enjoyable as another memorable bad guy (although still
drastically different from the comic book... why???).
Anne
Hathaway
as Selina (aka Catwoman)
also made it enjoyable for other reasons.
This
movie could have been helped with a better story, and of course a bit
of color. It could also have used some decent fight choreography,
and maybe a bit of lighting, less quick edits and pull your camera
back so we can see what's going on, but... maybe I'm silly.
Man
of Steel (2013)
The
more I think about this movie, the more it makes me angry. But I'm
not sure who to be angry at. Everything inside me, is eager to blame
Nolan, because I've always loved director Zack
Snyder.
But how much influence did Nolan as producer have over the project?
Nolan co-wrote the story with David
Goyer,
but who's decision was it to take away the core values of what makes
Superman a hero?
And
again you shout to me, “But
Deeesher, Superman really needed a 2013 reboot, and he's learning to
become a hero!”
And I say to you, stop yelling at me. And I very strongly agree,
Superman needed
a 2013 reboot... but this wasn't it. It is possible to keep the
important small town philosophy of Clark Kent, and still have him be
the hero we know for today.
Man of Steel had a lot of
potential, and after they spent millions of dollars making it, they
really fell short in my mind. There were a couple of nice scenes,
but they were heavily overshadowed by bad writing. I have a couple
of great ideas on how to make the Clark/Superman/Lois love triangle
work... but nobody asked me!
And again the look... between the
fast quick camera edits, the extremely annoying shaky cam making it
difficult to see, to the washed out uniforms and drab backgrounds, I
just feel cold and empty inside.
So
there ya go. Nolan's not a bad director, but maybe he's more suited
for television than taking our nerdly birthrights away from us. This
rant has been slowly building over the last few years, but the final
breaking point was after hearing the announcement of Man
of Steel 2,
with special guest star, Batman.
The roar of nerd-cheer was heard around the world... as I cringed in
terror. Are nerds and geeks so blinded by this epic event, that none
of them take a moment to really study what they are giving us??
Of course I will keep an open
mind, but given what I've seen so far, I am extremely apprehensive.
And this just in: Remember how painful
it was to hear about Nicholas Cage playing
Ghost Rider? Ben Affleck has been signed to
play the new Batman! At what point can I start shouting, “I
told you so!!” It seems Christopher Nolan
hates us, so it's okay for us to hate him back.
Oh
Joss
Whedon,
you've never hurt me. Please keep me safe with your big strong
Buffy/Angel/Firefly/Avengers
arms!
Make my dreams come true by writing and directing Wonder
Woman
pleeeeeease!!
Deeesher
Grammar aside you really think Nolan got Ben to be Batman?
ReplyDeleteAs much as I dislike Nolan's style, I don't think he had much say in the casting. I would blame Warner Bros for that idea. They want someone who will sell tickets. But he is too recognizable as Ben Afleck to convince me he is Batman.
DeleteYou should watch Dick Tracy instead of Batman
ReplyDeleteor Tron
DeleteI did enjoy the Dick Tracy movie, and thought it had a great visual style. And Tron (original and Legacy) have always been awesome to me :)
DeleteI cant agree enough. I don't loathe the man, but his fanboys are encouraging ignorance in the contemporary filmic community.
ReplyDeleteAlso: FINALLY someone has said that saying TDK is the best comic book film and thus the best film ever is bs- because were they THAT good to begin with?
Your thoughts on Interstellar would interest me greatly.