But I digress...
The reason I brought you all here today, is to discuss the sequel to Abrams 2009 Star Trek 'reboot' *coughs*. This one is called, Into Darkness.
If you recall, in our last trek to the stars, some disgruntled random Romulan altered our time line, just enough so nothing is the same, but many things are similar. I think the official rule is, Abrams picks what he wants to keep, and for everything else, you can blame it on the new timeline, and not Abrams.
This time, Kirk (Chris Pine) and crew go after terrorist John Harrison, (yes, we all know it, so say it with me here... actor Benedict Cumberbatch, who is equally awesome as a modern Sherlock Holmes in the BBC series, Sherlock).
For the most part, this was a fun movie. Abrams gave us a great solid bad guy this time, and Cumberbatch was interesting to watch. Although, I do wish they had given him a pure evil speech moment to solidify his official bad guyness, he was still consistently charismatic. There were also plenty of beautiful images of some ships, and it was an exciting movie to watch. Most of the characters and acting was good, and the running time of two hours and twelve minutes really flew by.
However... it was heavily flawed!
I know, I can hear everyone screaming, "But Deeesher, the timeline changed, and you are just annoyed cause it's not exactly like the Star Trek you know, so you need to get over yourself!". Well, first, I am over myself, thank you very much. And secondly, I'm not expecting it to be like the Star Trek I know. I'm referring to simple common sense. I don't care if it's Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica, or Doctor Who. I'm looking for good solid writing and directing styles, (and for the record, the current Doctor Who wins that hands down).
So allow me a few moments to nitpick. Let's begin with:
Directing. Oh J.J., will you ever learn??? A lens flare is an effect, not a lifestyle choice! Lens flare isn't quite as overwhelming as 2009's Star Trek, but it is still heavily overdone. Can I just watch two people having a conversation without a lens flare blinding me please? And can we have a choreographed fight scene where I can see the action please?!? For the record, the chase scene towards the end, and ensuing fight weren't too painful to watch. However, every other fight was just poorly directed.
Set Design. From the thrown together garbage dump that is engineering, to the disorganization of the bridge on the Enterprise, (as well as the dreadnaught ship), it would be nice if someone had a sense of symmetry or the simple concept of a layout that you can understand. The dreadnaught ship interiors were too dark to get any clear idea of how it looked, and the Enterprise bridge was painfully and unnecessarily bright (obviously lending itself to more and more lens flare opportunities).
Costumes. Who seriously approved any of these outfits?!? Does the color Lifeless Grey exist? Because that's what they used for the boring dress uniforms, (including the painfully unnecessary caps). The enemy uniforms looked like a couple of grey and blue cloths of basketball mesh recklessly sewn together. Even Cumberbatch wears nothing but a simple black shirt and pants. I really think Abrams was doing everything he could to stay away from anything that people might want to cosplay at a convention! He only used the traditional red, blue and yellow uniforms out of some obligation. And even then, he looked for any opportunity to take them off, to wear more black or browns. With these dark boring styles, mixed with the bland dark convoluted backgrounds, it was even more difficult to see any type of action sequence, when everything just blended together.
Writing. Remember when I said the story was decent and moved along very nicely? Don't question it. Don't study it. Don't examine it. Don't you dare think for one second. Because the moment you start to think, you will find flaws. Endless flaws. Flaws in common sense, and flaws in simple logic. I could give you the list, but we would be here for a while. There are some bad ideas that nobody in their right mind would do. There are some homages that feel extremely forced and painfully predictable. For some reason, Abrams continues to use writers Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof. When will someone in Hollywood realize, these guys aren't that good! Between Prometheus, Lost, Cowboys and Aliens, and Transformers, none of these were known for their great storylines! Okay, maybe Lost had a few decent moments, but gather a room full of nerds together during a panel discussion at any random sci-fi convention, and they could accidentally write a better story that makes more sense than anything these guys have ever written. Stick to television and stop ruining our movies guys!
I have said (often), one of the reasons I respect the original Star Trek, is because most episodes were written by actual science fiction authors (such as Norman Spinrad, Harlan Ellison, David Gerrold etc), just like the original Twilight Zone, and the original Outer Limits. What happened to those days? Why can't we hire real writers to write our movies and television shows again? They are the ones with talent. Give them a job please!
Anyway, putting things back into perspective, Into Darkness is still not a bad movie. Abrams did give us a few beautiful images of the Enterprise that were perfect for any computer desktop. I even started to accept Chris Pine a bit more as Kirk (although he still has some growing up to do). Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban and Simon Pegg (Uhura, McCoy, and Scotty) all did fantastic jobs again. But biggest kudos to Zachary Quinto for Spock. This felt like his movie from beginning to end.
So if you've never seen any incarnation of Star Trek in your entire life, and if you don't like thinking cause it hurts your brain too much, you will really like Star Trek Into Darkness. Oh and by the way... stupidest title for a movie ever!
And by the way again... I am eagerly anticipating cosplay versions of Wetsuit Uhura!
Boldly being Deeesher
